Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 02:23

Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Thank you.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
The Ocean Is Getting Darker, Threatening All That Lives Within - ScienceAlert
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Social Security's 2026 COLA Has an Unpleasant Surprise in Store for Retirees - The Motley Fool
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
What is the appeal of vampire stories and why are they popular in various forms of media?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Observations from Titans Minicamp on Wednesday - Tennessee Titans
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Why are Korean female leads so angry all the time?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What’s next?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
NASA’s Hurricane Science, Tech, Data Help American Communities - NASA Science (.gov)